Broker Check
AI: Bubble, Revolution, or Both?

AI: Bubble, Revolution, or Both?

| May 17, 2026

My thoughts after reading a recent article in Wired Magazine on AI? The rise of artificial intelligence has become one of the dominant forces driving today’s financial markets. A small group of technology companies tied to AI development has powered much of the recent growth in the stock market, leading many investors to ask an important question: Are we witnessing another investment bubble?

The answer is more complicated than a simple yes or no.

Economists Avi Goldfarb and Josh Kirsch argue that part of today’s speculation surrounding artificial intelligence stems from the fact that many people still do not fully understand what AI is, what it can realistically accomplish, or how it will ultimately reshape the economy. That uncertainty creates both excitement and fear. Investors know AI could become transformational, but they do not yet know which companies will ultimately succeed, how profits will develop, or how long adoption will take.

History shows this is common during major technological shifts.

The railroad boom, electricity, automobiles, and the internet all experienced periods of intense speculation. Investors poured money into these technologies long before markets fully understood how they would permanently change society. Some companies became enormously successful. Others disappeared entirely. The technology itself survived and transformed the economy, even when many early investments failed.

Artificial intelligence may follow a similar path.

Unlike the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, however, today’s leading AI companies are not merely speculative startups with no revenue. Companies such as Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta are highly profitable firms generating significant cash flow while investing heavily in AI infrastructure. That is an important distinction. The current environment may contain speculative elements, but it is built upon companies with real businesses and real earnings.

At the same time, legitimate risks exist.

One of the largest concerns is market concentration. A relatively small number of AI-related companies now make up an unusually large portion of major stock indexes. Many investors believe they are highly diversified because they own multiple mutual funds inside their 401(k) plans. In reality, many large-cap growth funds, S&P 500 index funds, target-date funds, and balanced funds all own many of the same AI-driven technology stocks.

As a result, diversified portfolios may be more concentrated than they appear.

This does not necessarily mean a collapse is coming. More likely, it means investors should prepare for the possibility of heightened volatility if expectations surrounding AI growth become too optimistic. Markets do not require a technology to fail in order for valuations to decline. Sometimes expectations simply become unrealistic.

The internet provides an excellent historical example. The dot-com crash destroyed many speculative companies, but the internet itself ultimately transformed commerce, communication, and business operations worldwide. Amazon survived and thrived. Other once-popular firms disappeared completely. Artificial intelligence could follow a similar trajectory where the technology changes the economy permanently while some current market leaders fail to justify their valuations.

For 401(k) investors, the lesson is not to avoid artificial intelligence altogether. AI will likely become deeply integrated into the economy over time. Instead, the lesson is to understand what is actually inside a portfolio and to maintain a disciplined, diversified investment strategy.

From a fiduciary perspective, this reinforces the importance of prudent process over speculation. Plan sponsors and participants should avoid chasing recent performance, understand concentration risks within supposedly diversified funds, and maintain long-term investment discipline. Diversification still matters, particularly during periods of rapid technological enthusiasm.

Goldfarb and Kirsch’s analysis ultimately suggests that some fear of an AI bubble may itself come from uncertainty surrounding a technology people do not yet fully understand. That uncertainty can fuel excessive optimism, but it can also fuel excessive pessimism. The challenge for investors is separating the long-term transformational potential of artificial intelligence from the short-term market excitement surrounding it.

As with many technological revolutions throughout history, both the enthusiasm and the risks may be real at the same time.