Broker Check
The lost art of dialogue and communication

The lost art of dialogue and communication

| April 23, 2026

I have been a member of Toastmasters for 25 years. One principle is emphasized relentlessly in that organization: if you want to be effective, you must be understood. And if you want to be understood, you must first understand your audience.

That sounds straightforward—until you are placed in an environment where the audience has no intention of listening.

In one particular speech project, I was assigned to present on a controversial topic while being deliberately interrupted. The purpose was to test composure, adaptability, and the ability to maintain control under pressure. The rules were simple: three audience members would be pre-selected to interrupt, and once their interruption was addressed, they were finished.

At least, that was the plan.

When I stood up to speak, I quickly realized the rules had changed. Instead of three participants, the entire audience had been invited to interrupt. Not only that, they were encouraged to interrupt repeatedly—and even simultaneously.

My speech topic? “Dogs are better than cats.”

What followed was not a speech. It was chaos.

Two audience members called each other on their cell phones and spoke loudly over me. One person walked to the front of the room and began playing the electric piano. I unplugged it. Others talked among themselves, stared at the ceiling, or ignored me entirely. One person calmly sketched in a notebook. By the end, paper airplanes were flying through the air toward the stage.

Even my best prop—my dog, Ka-Boom!, revealed from a backpack—was not enough to cut through the noise.

At that point, communication was not difficult. It was impossible. The structure required for dialogue had collapsed. No one was listening. No one was engaging. There was only noise.

It is tempting to dismiss this as an artificial exercise—something that would never happen in real life.

But look around.

We increasingly see environments—whether political, professional, or even within organizations—where people are not listening to understand. They are reacting, dismissing, interrupting, or simply disengaging. Messages are delivered, but not received. Positions are stated, but not considered.

Even a simple, clear message can be ignored or distorted if the audience is unwilling to engage with it.

Consider the above photo, two political signs in Redding, California. The candidate's message of "Freedom. Justice. Opportunity." should be clear and easy to understand. But rather than dialogue or communicate, someone decided to vandalize the signs.

So what is the appropriate response?

Do you speak louder? Replace the message? Repeat it more forcefully? Or do you step back and reconsider the approach entirely?

The lesson from that failed speech is not about handling interruptions. It is about recognizing when communication conditions no longer exist—and adjusting accordingly.

When you face a tough audience—whether it is a divided electorate or employees reluctant to participate in a 401(k)—the objective is not to win the argument in the moment. It is to reestablish the conditions where communication can occur at all.

That requires three things.

First, acknowledge the reality of the audience. If they are resistant, distracted, or distrustful, pretending otherwise only widens the gap.

Second, simplify and humanize the message. People do not engage with abstractions; they engage with relevance. “Freedom, justice, opportunity” means little unless the audience sees how it applies directly to their lives. The same is true when encouraging someone to save for retirement—if they do not see the immediate value, they will tune out.

Third, earn the right to be heard. That is not done through volume or repetition. It is done through credibility, consistency, and demonstrating that you understand their perspective—even if you disagree with it.

In the end, communication is not about delivering a message. It is about creating connection in an environment where connection may not naturally exist.

And sometimes, the most important skill is recognizing that before you can persuade an audience, you must first get them to listen.